Rebecca K. Reynolds

Honest Company for the Journey

"Notes from a Bus Ride"

 

His mouth opened wider on the right hand side. Forty years of talking to passengers over his shoulder had left it that way, I guess. 

His features were definite, no gentle transitions between the nose, or cheeks, or eyes. One part stopped and another began. Like a student sketch of Michelangelo's "David," he was a collection of lines and planes.

I'd guess he was maybe seventy years old. Hadn't shaved in a day or two, and he talked from somewhere down in his belly, not so much loud, but with a  timbre chosen to carry over the engine noise.

His wrinkles ran dug deep where they existed, none of these fine lines -- he had honest to goodness furrows. I found myself wanting to run a thin washrag under hot water, and then wash his face for him. I never felt an impulse like that for a stranger before I became a mother.

When I was twenty-two I might have talked him into sitting under a single low-watt lightbulb while I drew the shadows that rolled off his edges. He would have looked fine on some of that pastel grey paper, using charcoal for shadows and white pencil for highlights. I wish now I'd asked to take a picture of him.

He wore a khaki Carhartt hat with earflaps that folded under. A line of old grease ran around the edges. Dirty salt and pepper hair, maybe two or three inches long, hung out this way and that in feathers around the sides.

The morning was cool for April, and he had on one of those padded flannel shirt jackets in a bold black-and-white buffalo print. Underneath that there was another flannel shirt, also black-and-white buffalo, but thinner.

I'd spent the first five minutes of the ride listening to a novel on my phone when I realized that I was missing a story in real time, so I pulled my headphones off and started to pay attention.

"...American coal," was the first thing I heard him say, but whatever he meant by that, I don't know, because then he picked up with, "'Never seen traffic like this except on the outskirts of Chicago."

While we merged into the interstate he took both his hands off the wheel to draw those Chicago roads out into the air with his fingers. I held my breath and braced my knees on the back of the seat.

"That woman who lives up over there in that house, she wouldn't let the city widen the street four feet. Four feet, that's all. There's a myst-ry there."

He looked back over his shoulder to make sure we heard it and felt the weight. "Sure is," I said, hoping he'd look back at the highway.

"That's right," he said and laughed and shook his head.

I told myself he'd been doing this long enough to not need to look at the roads. If his driving was really as bad as it felt, he'd have been killed already.

His seatbelt was off, and his body seemed too big for that bus. He was like men I remember from childhood, the ones who didn't take to being tamed. He was Lewis and Clark, tracing over every hill and every street. Or he was the bear who went over the mountain to see what he could see. Or he was Alexis de Tocqueville.

"You know a certain political party decided to kill President Kennedy so's they could start the Vietnam War."

"Really?" I said, even though it hadn't been a question.

"Absolutely," he said. "It's a fact, for sure. Your history books don't tell you that, of course. "

His laugh was like one of those big metal wind chimes. "Dong dong. Duh Dong."

"My dad was in sheet metal.  See over there right there, that was a sheet metal shop back in the 60's. He spent five years at the Freedom Hall putting that roof together. He was fifty two-years old... and that's the old colored school... this was just two or three streets right here, some of the best streets.

"Dad retired at fifty-six years old after getting hurt. Fell and hurt his back. You see that right there?  There's still a railroad street... a railroad street for the railroad buffs... You know the railroad buffs."

"Then the PO-lice. Yessir it is.... boy they used to have some of the meanest  beer joints 'round here, all kinds of shooting going on. Awl it was rough."

You could hear a warning about loose women in the silence he left, women who are dead now, or maybe running around retirement communities spreading venereal disease. That's hard for me to imagine, but I hear it's an epidemic some places.

We wound through back streets, past that little house with every concrete yard decoration ever made caged inside a chain wire fence. St. Francis of Assisi and the Buddha stare out like bears at the Cincinnati Zoo. 

We passed that house where somebody painted the concrete steps lilac purple. I don't come through that part of town much- just when I'm driving through to get somewhere else.

"This used to be a big eleMENtree school right there, yeah that was a big elementree school."

We went round a curve, and I saw his butt slide to the right. The colored wires that hung a bundle under the dashboard swung round. 125677 miles on the odometer. Keys dangling, jumping up and down with the potholes. An honest to goodness old fashioned CB.

He pulled his sunglasses off and bit one earpiece between his right teeth. "Let's see," he said, then he pulled us up beside a concrete block building on a little two-lane road. He didn't use the blinker.

When he yanked on the yellow brake, it let out a long hiss. Then he stood up and patted his butt bones and lumbered off the bus to take off his outer shirt. A couple of kids got off, too, and then he climbed back in to restart the engine.

Another two-lane road, thinner than than the last. On the left we passed a psychic reader sign: "SPECIAL. READINGS $5."

Prelude Hair Design.

McCain Attorneys At Law.

Massage Therapy and Associates.

Little sedan in front of us had a faded Pittsburg Steelers bumper sticker. Nobody around here goes for the Steelers. He ran over a Mountain Dew bottle, which sent it spinning into the gutter. The road opened up to four lanes, and we passed him. He was wearing an orange NASCAR jacket, and he had a cigarette in his mouth. He had that wheel gripped as if he were in a drag race.

I leaned my head against the window, and let it jiggle my skull into shivers. I used to do that as a kid all the time, and I'm not sure why. It feels hypnotic, I guess. The plastic window pulls were stuck an inch down, and the top of my hair got pulled out, caught in the wind we made at 55 MPH.

The driver took his hat off, leaving the hair on the back of his head sticks in a wild swirl. Then he stuck his tongue outside his mouth all the way, feeling his lower lip with the back of it. His neck has two skin tags and some age spots.

Pink leaves from the flowering trees got caught in the wind and blew across the road like a murmuration of starlings. Driver pointed through them to the forestry service where they give away free maps, and good ones.

Then he showed me something called the ARB and Buffalo Mountain. Said he was looking forward to walking that someday.

"You're full-blooded Norwegian," he says to the guy sitting behind him. "That's something to be proud of, right there. I used to drive up to Rockford, Illinois on 780 on the old two lane..."

We're on the mountain roads now, flying all over the place. I'm so carsick, and everything smells like machinery, like old men, and old leather work gloves, and like an old garage.

"Rockford's where they invented the cross joint. This guy started making nuts and bolts in his basement. "Screw city, they call it." He chuckles. "Screw city. Gotta be known for something, I guess."

The bus stops, and he wheels the door open. This is my exit. My knees shake while I'm trying to get down the steps.

Taking a big breath, I suck in half his oily air before finishing the intake outside. I'm a land lubber, disoriented by time travel.

"Thanks for the lift," I say, and either he doesn't hear me to answer, or he's already gone somewhere else, turned round to look out the window over his left shoulder.

Photo Credit: JasonGillman (Morguefile) 

Photo Credit: JasonGillman (Morguefile) 

"I'm Not Really Sure if That Was the Voice of God or Not"...

For a couple of decades I was too embarrassed to tell people this story.  It still makes me a little uncomfortable to admit what happened, but yeah, it's probably a good segue into a section of Luke I reread today. So, here it goes. (Flush.)

In 1994 I attended a national conference for an evangelical campus ministry organization. Nancy Leigh DeMoss spoke to all the staff members, and during that talk, she explained the difference between broken people and proud people.

Her delivery was extraordinary. However, the response of the crowd shocked me into paralysis.

Staff members from all over the country started pouring up to the front to confess their sins in front of everybody. Dozens of people, then hundreds, then maybe thousands. This went on for days.

I'd never been to one of those conferences before, so I didn't know what was normal. Staff members who had attended these things for years started calling it a "revival," and they said it was different from anything that had ever taken place. They were ecstatic.

But I had no desire to confess sins of my own. I was just trying to figure out what in the world was going on. I wondered what sort of group I had joined. I was cynical. I was wigged out. I kind of wanted to get out of there.

For years after this event, staff members talked about that unique outpouring of the Spirit. "Do you remember when..." they would ask one another. Yet I had to say that I was smack in the middle of a major revival with my arms crossed. Doubtful.

I was the Apostle Thomas quietly asking, "How do I know this is legit?"

I was hesitant because I didn't want to be a fool. I thought it was safer to doubt than to yield to the mighty surge of energy in the room and then find out that energy had been nothing but human emotion.

Jesus said his disciples would know his voice, but this time I apparently didn't. That bothered me for a long time.

I wondered if something was wrong with me or my beliefs. I even questioned my salvation, because I wondered what sort of believer could watch a major revival without being overwhelmed by it.

A lot of time has passed since then. I've had time to look at doubt and childlike faith from lots of different angles, and I'm hoping to explore some of those angles in the next few days on this blog. However, I'm going to start today with only a quick introduction to a couple of characters in the book of Luke.

Zachariah, an old, faithful soul who had grown so used to disappointment, he was hesitant to believe that God might show up and do him a unique good. Haven't a lot of us hit this point in faith? We've tried to believe, obey, follow, wait. But God seems to be quiet so long, we aren't sure we even have a line in to be heard.

Meanwhile, a few paragraphs later, the young, compliant soul of Mary responded matter-of-factly to the life-shattering news that she (a virgin!) was going to have a baby.

"I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.." almost effortlessly. 

How does belief come so reflexively in certain types of souls? Did she just ace the Myers-Briggs? Or is it like a leap by a trained dancer, a move that looks weightless because every muscle has been toned for that exact moment? 

I don't know. But Mary's response parallels an attitude I see later in her Son in the garden of Gethsemane. In His darkest and loneliest night, Jesus is being asked to bear not one child, but to bear all the children of God through His intensely painful labor. He would spill water and blood, though not womb water and uterine blood. His delivery of the children of God would come through His own death, and instead of an infant's wail at a first breath, He would be the one to cry out in a last breath.

That choice didn't seem as simple as Mary's did. He agonized. He struggled till he sweated blood. Still, he says, "Not my will but Thine," allowing his individual story to fold into a larger narrative.


In the next few days I'm hoping to unpack some of this into two more posts: 

1. DOUBT and HESITANCY: What do people like us, who live in the era of cynicism, do with this stuff? Is it okay to wrestle like Philip Yancey or Thomas, or should we be innocent and trusting like Lucy in Narnia?

2. IDENTITY. Where do we find it? What about our critics? What about our self-criticism? In an unsafe world, is cynicism an important part of our identity that we shouldn't abandon?


For tonight, I'm leaving you with these two drawings. I put them on opposite sides of these two pages because they are such interesting characters to study together. And also I'm kind of hoping the images will inspire you to read through this first part of Luke with me. If you do, I'd love to hear what you notice.
 

Luke 1:1-25

(Today my new journaling Bible finally arrived. I'm in love. Combo of Prismacolor and acrylic paint here. Wrote something to go with it below. Join me? I'd love to see what you're making. What does this passage mean to you?)

Incense in a tired old beard.
Decades of disappointment
have dug furrows in the face of faithfulness.

"This is not how I thought it would be,
but I will resign,
and I will resign though you slay me." 

Obedience makes for a long silence.
Yet every lost prayer
has come into the presence of God:
the prayer of expectancy,
the prayer of disillusionment,
the prayer of despair,
the prayer of resignation.

Until you expect nothing at all but to die
when like a punchline (do not fear) 
the time is ripe at last!

Old man, bite into the new kingdom
like a summer peach
with every tooth you have left
in your cave mouth,
dig in, dig in,
and let joy's run juice down your chin.

It's not about your FOMO.

Every few days it seems I read another blog post about how we are all addicted to our smart phones. Acronyms like "FOMO" (fear of missing out) have been created to try to pinpoint our addiction and shame us into putting technology away for a bit.

But this morning I was watching a video a friend posted and realized something.  Well, maybe I should just let you watch it first...  a public service announcement created to combat texting and driving in New Zealand. 

Put your passengers first. Drive Phone Free www.nzta.govt.nz/drivephonefree

So yeah. It's funny. But what I love most about this video is that it moves the focus away from shame to the bigger goal. 

When I'm creating a post for this blog, there's an option in the photo settings that allows me to orient a single focus point. (Thanks for showing me how to do this, BTW, Carey Pace.) I took a screen shot of that process below. See the little circle? I can click on that and move it around so that when my posts come up in thumbnail, there is an emphasis on the area of a photo that I consider most important.
 

When it comes to internet addiction (or any addiction I've struggled with, really) this has tended to be an important concept for me.

Instead of just saying "__________ is bad, I should shame myself into stopping that," I tend to see more life change when I ask, "What do I want my true focus to be instead?"

"FOMO" is a funny concept, but I don't think the fear of missing out is my main problem with social media. I think it's more that sometimes I lose my bearings, my identity, and my purpose in the noise of life. I get tired of all the stress and fear in our culture, and my insecurities start to make me overthink stuff. When all that chaos happens, it's easy to just kind of wander around trying to find myself online.

Another option, though, is to realize that I'm out of focus and take the little white circle of my heart and hover it over true center.

I don't mean to oversimplify here, but most art has a central idea that guides it. Robert Henri's The Art Spirit urges painters to continually return to the flash of inspiration that launched a painting. A similar concept is taught by Dorothy Sayers in her Mind of the Maker.  An artist applies energy to an idea. Creators dip into inspiration like paint. So it is with faith, except the idea is a Person instead of just an image.

Have you ever noticed that when secular people talk about Christianity, they tend to reduce faith to a choice between (1) trying to be a good person or (2) giving in to being a bad person? But I don't think this is the big choice the New Testament gives us.

There are several places in the Bible that show us choices that boil down more to (1) trying to do good in our own strength, or (2) leaning into the resources and love of the Spirit.

As I see it, faith is more about wanting autonomy from God vs. communion with God than it is about deciding to be bad or good.

For example:


Romans 8: 5-6 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit.  For to set the mind on the flesh is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace.

See the split? It's not sin vs. non-sin. It's living in the flesh vs. living in the Spirit.


This is why attempts to just give up the internet (or any other addiction)  rarely produce any sort of lasting change. When I get restless, needy, rebellious, destructive, distracted, it usually comes down to a focal point problem in my heart. 


 
There are several ways I've found to move that slider over to center. (I think different personality types tend to engage with God and His resources differently. If you've never read the book Sacred Pathways by Gary Thomas, it's probably worth your time.)

But the simple realization that our focus is off can also be helpful sometimes. Seeing that we haven't seen ourselves clearly can be like a splash of cold water waking us up to the truth. It's like that moment in a fairy tale when a prince is found living like a beggar, because he has forgotten that he is the son of a king.

At least in my life, simply resisting one distraction will only throw me into another one, if I don't make time to bury my love in true center. My willpower just runs out. I can't live just saying no to what is bad, with a gigantic vacuum constantly roaring inside me... I have to drink down what is life-giving and full of joy, energy, creativity, honesty, and strength instead.


This allows so many things to fall into a healthy groove: curiosity, longing, even restlessness. Those essential parts of my personality don't go away, they just stop yanking me around, trying to push me off cliffs. They become healthy drives instead of destructive drives. And this begins with replacement, not just resistance.
 

Addiction (at last for me) is not just about the fear of missing out, see? It's about missing out because I was looking for myself in all the wrong places. I've misunderstood what I really am and what the world really is. I've been driving distracted. 

So when the chaos comes, when that urge to fly out into all directions hits -- whether you are making a piece of art, or making a piece of life -- I think it's possible to come back to center to find the core.

Sometimes that return is simple. Sometimes it can take a bit of a search (ask an artist about this process). However, I'm trying to keep these posts shorter, so I'm going to save that expansion for another day...

 

"Disappointed by God" (a new song and essay on the Rabbit Room)

If you follow me on Facebook, you know that a few days ago I told you that a Holy Week surprise would be coming up on the Rabbit Room. Well, the day for that has come.

At the link you can find a song that multi Grammy-winner Ron Block (from Ron Block of Alison Krauss and Union Station), Jeff Taylor, and I wrote a couple of years ago. Dove Award-winner Ellie Holcomb is featured for the solo.

This song will eventually be included on our next record; however, we wanted to give you this part of our project early. Especially on Good Friday, I think it's a fit.

We're praying for you and the disappointments you are facing. You're not alone. But resurrection comes.

"Sure, I believe that unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies it can't do much good, but still I wonder if every caterpillar somehow believes that it is spinning a coffin instead of a womb."

CLICK HERE: https://www.rabbitroom.com/2016/03/disappointed-by-god/

Does Praying for the Sick Do Any Good?

Every once in a while, a group of scientists will design a new study that attempts to prove whether or not intercessory prayer helps medical patients recover. 

I understand why these studies are attempted. When I was completing my graduate degree, I worked with a local medical school on a cancer research project. We found that superstitious beliefs about prayer tend to cause far too many unnecessary deaths in Appalachia. There are people here who refuse to take medicine that could heal them because they decide to "trust God" instead. God doesn't intervene. Then those people die.

Photo Credit: Morgue File (imelenchon)

Photo Credit: Morgue File (imelenchon)

It has to be so frustrating for doctors to watch this over and over again. Imagine devoting years of your life to the medical practice, staying up late studying, exhausting your body in long years of residency, finally learning the secrets of how to help people live... then because of some backwoods, twisted view of faith, a patient refuses to follow your instructions.

Photo Credit : MorgueFile (Alvimann)

Photo Credit : MorgueFile (Alvimann)

If I were an unbelieving physician in a medical community plagued with this sort of behavior, I would be desperate to find some way to prove this sort of faith irresponsible. I would be designing studies on prayer, trying to expose flaws in superstition, and urging people to follow simple medical instruction.

But there are also reasons some of these studies are inherently flawed, and I'm not sure an unbelieving scientist would discover those reasons without receiving input from a believer in God. So I'm writing out a few of the problem areas I've noticed below, hoping they will provide clarity for future discussions on this matter.
 

1. First, there is no empirically-responsible way to qualify or quantify studies on intercessory prayer. 

Even students participating in fifth-grade science fair projects are taught that research variables must be measurable. Meeting this requirement becomes very difficult in studies on prayer. Most of the research that I've read has allowed prayer to be defined as (a) anything considered an appeal by (b) any given soul (c) aimed at any sort of immortal being that a soul imagines.

This would be the empirical equivalent of a scientist attempting to research canine parvo vaccines by injecting random fluids that he decides to calls parvo vaccines into any animal he decides to call a dog. Sure, he could inject 10ccs of Gatorade into a chicken and say some sort of point has been proven about parvovirus and dogs, but his research would be inherently flawed because it hasn't been properly qualified.

To study prayer with any measure of scientific credibility, (a.) a specific deity would have to be determined, (b.) a means of establishing legitimate communication between that deity and the deity’s supposed followers would have to be established (to eschew imposters or frauds), (c.) and some means of deciding that all prayers offered in the study were in accordance with that deity’s theological standards would have to be named. Here's the rub. Steps two and three are virtually impossible to measure empirically.

Scientists may presuppose that a single true God does not exist, or they may presuppose that any god worth his salt would accommodate all requests regardless of a prayer's form. They may also push those presuppositions to the side out of desperation to stop superstition from killing their patients. However, these presuppositions would also distort the scientific strength of a study. If the goal of a study is simply to produce a rhetorical tool that urges naive patients to take their medicine, that's one thing. But these studies prove very little about how a true God might relate to prayer.

Photo Credit : MorgueFile (by hilarycl)

Photo Credit : MorgueFile (by hilarycl)

 

2. Secondly, studies on intercessory prayer tend to assume that a god would allow himself to be discovered and validated empirically. They demand that the transcendent subject itself to established rules of physics and biology instead of existing within and beyond those principles.

This assumption violates what most religious beliefs claim about the mechanics of the transcendent. The Christian God, for instance, openly says that He hides Himself at times, and He says that we are not to test Him. When someone who is proud or defiant comes to God, demanding to see Him "or else," God is free to put up walls to prevent Himself from being found. If God were a physical substance like Mammoth Cave or the McDonalds on Fifth Street, He couldn’t reveal or conceal Himself at will. But He is a powerful, living being, and engagement with Him comes on His terms. 

While it’s understandable that doubters may see this as a “loophole” that people of faith can hide behind – or even accuse God of being cruel for not revealing Himself equally to all people making all demands -- when placed in the context of a human relationship, the trust required by God becomes more clear.

Imagine a girlfriend being told by her boyfriend that she has to complete a series of scientific tests to prove her loyalty. Imagine a husband being told by his wife that he has to undergo a series of diagnostic experiments before their relationship can continue. If most of us were approached like this by another human, we would say, “Something is wrong here, not with me, but with you. You don’t know how to have a decent relationship.”

Marriages that require obsessive checking of one another’s texts and search histories don’t prove faithfulness, they prove a reliance on fear and suspicion.  And to think that a God (a superior life form) would allow us to call the shots on how we find him is a bit silly. Yes, He is loving. No, He’s not a pushover. If we try to bully ourselves into an engagement with the transcendent, insisting on finding Him on our own terms, we are unlikely to find Him at all.

3. The Christian God has often disappointed His own believers by not doing what He was asked when He was asked to do it.

Yes, I know that there are some Christians who claim that if we have enough faith God will start obeying us like a cosmic border collie. Yes, I know that some Christians claim that because Jesus negated the Fall, all sickness and suffering could easily be under our command if we just believe enough.

I think those claims are bad theology.

Jesus delayed in coming to Mary and Martha when Lazarus was sick. He even let Lazarus die so that another purpose might be fulfilled. Paul (the primary writer of the New Testament) asked three times for some physical malady that was plaguing him to be removed, but God had other purposes. He denied Paul’s appeal for healing. David begged God for the life of an infant son who died. Even Jesus prayed for God to provide some way out of His upcoming suffering and death, but God turned that appeal down.

In John 9 the disciples find a man who was born blind, and they ask Jesus:  “why was this man born blind? Was it a result of his own sins or those of his parents?”

 “Neither,” Jesus answered. “But to demonstrate the power of God.” 

We want God to obey us; we want Him to make life stop hurting. That's understandable. But God is not a lucky rabbit’s foot, and sometimes He allows horrific, hard things like sickness and death to happen. I don't mean that He causes these things, but I do think He is able to redeem pain in ways that cannot make sense to us in the present. (And no, we shouldn't minimize the deep confusion and sorrow of the suffering by dismissively stating a platitude like, "God has a plan for this!" But that is a relational problem to be tackled in another essay.) In regard to miracles, yes, God did say to pray and mountains would be removed. But sometimes the mountains that need to be removed and thrown into the sea are in our souls instead of in our bodies. 

Photo Credit: Morgue File (taliesin)

Photo Credit: Morgue File (taliesin)

I do believe in occasional miracles. I do pray for the sick to be healed. Sometimes God has answered my prayers in unexplainable ways like I hoped He would. I believe there are situations in which God allows His hand to be moved by our requests, but I don't understand how all of that works or why. It's not like a magic formula... and in attempting to understand requestive communication with God, I've learned a lot more about the beautiful depths of His heart and wisdom than I have about how to steer Him.

But also, what is a miracle other than the bending of common rules of physics, chemistry, and biology? In attempting to get to the bottom of this, we can get hyper-focused on outliers, because we are scared of loss, and we want to be in control. But if we stand back and look at this synchronized universe that runs like a marvelous machine, there's also a lot to be in awe of without requiring God to shazaam a new puff of purple smoke out of which white doves of healing fly. He loves us; He loves us; He loves us...whether He does what we want Him to or not.

For either scientists or people of faith to approach human illness as some sort of laboratory for determining God’s existence or goodness, in my view, is missing the point entirely. I think that if we could see God as He is, we would realize that prayer is as much about aligning our hearts to His as it is about asking for miracles. 

I understand why these tests are conducted and how a world that worships human power might think that dimensions and beings beyond our capacity can be tested like bacteria in a petri dish. But folks who try to determine such things tend to remind me of children drawing on cardboard boxes to make space ships so they can fly them to the moon. Nice ideas, but they just aren't going to ever get off the ground.

It’s all too primitive. No matter how noble the intentions, these are works of flawed science and flawed theology. We cannot commandeer God’s revelations to us, and any attempt to do so reveals a gross misunderstanding of who God is and how He works.

P.S. And by the way, Christian patients... take your medicines. God asks us to respect and honor those we encounter, and your doctors have worked hard to help you. Sure, be discerning. Sure, get a second opinion. But while you are being treated, be a good witness to these caregivers. Show the love of God, and do not insult those who are trying to care for you.

Everybody is a Child of God?

“Everybody is a child of God” they say, and I feel a tickle of pleasure at the sound of those words.

The idea of a big-bosomed Grandma god who bakes pies and welcomes everybody in to the banquet table at the end of all things feels good to consider, and maybe that’s how it will go.

by Norman Rockwell

by Norman Rockwell

Maybe there’s a tiny little gap somewhere in exegesis that I’m missing.

The people of the Old Testament sure didn’t expect the mercy of Jesus to come crashing down on their sin ledgers. All those years of bleeding lambs out for human wrongs had crystallized Israel so that she couldn’t think beyond activity representing grace into the cosmic extravagance that her activity meant.

The Bible is a complicated book, and I can sort of squint one eye, and hold my breath, and look at Scripture in a slant-wise sort of way that allows all paths to lead to God. I’m telling you that ahead of time so that you’ll know what I’m about to write isn’t due to a lack of imagination.

But imagining how something could go is different from making a promise that it will go that way.

These days I see people assuring one another all the time, talking about how believing in a general sense of love is all it takes, arguing that any god worth his salt wouldn’t condemn anybody long term.

But that’s an awfully big conclusion to just spout out as if we knew it to be true.

And even though I’ve stared pretty hard at this, I don’t see how anybody who respects the Bible at all has the nerve to ask anybody else to take that risk. The consequences of being wrong here are too severe. I would never just assure a cancer patient not to take chemo because I didn’t like the thought of what it does in a body. I don’t have the qualification or the right to convince somebody of something so costly.

Yeah, I get that fear has been abused by various sects of religion, and that because of this abuse, people are trying to help other people heal by presenting a kinder, gentler god. Some of these folks offering universal grace are trying to reduce anxiety, trying to create unity. They are trying to keep warring factions from murdering one another, for goodness sakes. But it’s possible for the best desires to fall victim to false solutions.

I think our present culture is particularly vulnerable to this because we have a disdain for meta-narrative (big stories that are supposed to explain everything). We also don’t like authority much.

I think that’s why we see so many bloggers who tend to use Christianity as a vehicle for promoting social justice or compassion. Who doesn’t agree that those are nice things?

But like Chesterton warned, it’s possible to pick only certain virtues from within the faith to embrace without embracing the faith as a whole. And that makes for a super dangerous divide. The Bible becomes monstrous when it is squished down and vivisected.

Let me show you a little of what I mean. Read this bit from II Thessalonians and see how it strikes you:

“Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”

Here we have a passage where there is a delusion SENT by God. Whoa.

People are always asking, “Does God save people in the jungles of Africa who have never heard about him?” but I think this passage is way harder. This is God intentionally putting people in a place of misunderstanding to expose the truth about wayward hearts. And the consequences are severe.

If that doesn’t shake you up just a little when laid up next to the ooshy-gooshy god most folks talk about these days, I’d be surprised.

What place is there in anything we believe about a loving Christ for this kind severity? Doesn’t it defy the easy, honeyed gospel we have been offered?

Not that you need anything else to make you more cynical about religious people... but let's talk practically here a minute, because you need to see this straight. 

In a world where bloggers build platform, and platform can mean tends or hundreds of thousands of advertising dollars a year... well, I hate to say it, but most people are going to tell you what you want to hear.

Hardly anybody will forward a post like this one. It’s not warm and fuzzy feel-good stuff; it's a message that is lethal to my platform in this day and age, and I write every word understanding that. Because if I go all out and say, "God has wrath against sin," how does that make you feel?

You want to yell, “How dare he," right? Or “He put us here! How could he expect us to do any better?” Or maybe, “Yeah, that's what religious cults say before they try to herd the masses.”

Hard language makes you mistrust me. I can feel those objections rising.

That's why I'm tempted to just wax with feminine eloquence about grace every single day. It would make me fast friends with believers and non-believers alike. But how could I love you, really love you, if I think there’s probably more to the story that I never tell along side the pretty parts?

And is it fear mongering to tell someone about a danger that is real? How could it be kind to tell you what would tickle your fancy if you are in legitimate risk of experiencing something awful that most people are too scared or too insecure to mention? Do I really love myself so much that I’m not willing to risk telling you more of what I think is true? Maybe so. It's hard for me to write this. I'm super uncomfortable right now. I know how this kind of proposition settles in our culture these days.

Maybe that's why a lot of people avoid talking about it. Really, the only folks I see discussing divine justice lately are either Westboro Baptist weirdo-types or televangelists looking to use fear to ignite donations. A lot of evangelicals are either busy trying to build insular megachurches based on "felt needs," or they are trying to be cool about saving the world by hipster osmosis.

So how does a regular person even start to shoot straight with you?

I guess one way to begin is with a story that was written thousands of years ago, long before the time of Jesus. From what I can tell, carbon dating places the earliest versions of this narrative 300-100 years before Jesus was even born.

The people of Israel were captive in Egypt as slaves. There’s a lot of history as to why they were there, but I’m just going to start in the middle of their imprisonment and move forward.

God told the Pharaoh to let the prisoners go, but the Pharaoh didn’t want to lose cheap immigrant labor. So God started ramping it up. "Let them go!" Sent plagues. "Let them go!" Sent frogs. "Let them go!" Sent disease. Insects that ate all their crops.

Pharaoh kept saying no.

Finally, God said, “I’m going to take all the first-born children.” And the only way anybody could escape that horrible outcome was to kill a perfect lamb and spread the blood on their houses.

"The Israelites are eating the Passover Lamb" by Marc Chagall

"The Israelites are eating the Passover Lamb" by Marc Chagall

When the angel passed by those marked houses, the people who lived inside them wouldn’t receive the penalty. They would be passed over. Didn't matter who they were. Didn't matter what they'd done. What saved them was the blood on their house.

That night, the angel came through and killed all the firstborn who weren’t living in a house with that marking. Killed them. Gone. Can you imagine the wailing that rose up the next morning in that city?

You don’t like that story, do you? It rubs us the wrong way.

We feel entitled to a world where everybody lives, blood on the house or not. After all, God is supposed to be love, right? How could he allow all those little babies to be killed? What had they done wrong? Who even believes this stuff?

But in this case, God was also justice. He did something absolutely severe as a result of sin, and the only way to escape that consequence was to follow the one route he offered.

It’s not an ecumenical plan, for sure. The Egyptians were spiritual folks, but not one of the alternative routes of spirituality that they chased worked. There was a single way to survive, and all those people who laughed at it, or hated the idea of it, or whatever they did the night before were grieving the next day. It didn’t matter whether they agreed or not. What happened happened.



The Egyptians were spiritual folks, but not one of the alternative routes of spirituality that they chased worked. There was a single way to survive, and all those people who laughed at it, or hated the idea of it, or whatever they did the night before were grieving the next day.
 

It’s not accidental that thousands of years later, Jesus was celebrating the Passover with His disciples before he went to the cross to die. He was the Passover Lamb, see? He is the mark (the only mark) that can get spread all over us, so that when death comes, we escape it.

Ooh, it burns, doesn’t it? I can feel the hair on the backs of your necks rising. How dare He? But He did.

It’s difficult for me to know how to offer that sort of protection to you.

Progressive Christians say I can’t just explain the gospel forthrightly and then say, “Do you want this?” They tell me you have to be spoon fed, either by poetry, or by example... that you have to be kind of tricked into liking this, and that you can only take truth watered down.

But gosh, I’d hate for you to never have anybody say it straight and simple. God has provided protection for you, and it’s not just being a good person, or believing in the idea of love, or a general hazy grace that carries the universe. This is more primitive and severe, to our eyes. But I think it’s also true.

As unpopular as it is to say it, yes, I do think God holds wrath against sin. But I think He’s also provided a way to escape that wrath for those willing to take it. Jesus died so that we could be marked with His forgiveness before death; so we could stay safe in His house while the punishment passes by.

"The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb" (by Hans Holbein the Younger)

"The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb" (by Hans Holbein the Younger)

I certainly will leave room for God to do something unexpected at the end of things, and I will rejoice if He does. But I can’t make any promises that you’ll be okay if you don’t take Him up on what’s clearly before you right now. 

I hope you’ll receive the protection that He is offering instead of banking on your own sense of how things should work. Because really, you could stand before God in the end of things, and shake your little fist, and say, “I’m angry! I totally disagree with how you did all this."

And you could point to five different bloggers who are standing there with you, their mouths agape, all of you cussing and yelling, "Well, this ain't right!"

But that’s going to end up being a pretty small thing to say, if you are wrong.

So I don't see how I could love you if I didn't urge you to receive the offering that I know exists. There is a way to not only escape judgment, but to run from judgment into love and forgiveness you can hardly imagine. The way to do that is through asking Jesus to mark you with His blood and to trust in the safety He provides.

I don't claim to understand all the loopholes that might open up someday, but I do understand what is being given freely in the now. It's a gift that is sobering, and difficult, and beautiful, and almost surreal because it seems to work in a different dimension than the ones I'm used to.

But I know that what is offered through Jesus is love-driven. The kind of love that is costly. I know it's hope. It's newness of life. I hope you will let Him mark your doors. I hope you will decide to live inside love, protected from the coming storm.
 

He Planted Seven Peonies

He planted seven new peonies for me out front yesterday.

He was wearing that green flannel shirt, work-worn through in the back side, and as he threw that shovel down through the bed liner and busted up the March earth, I stood barefoot on the crumbled up sidewalk we can't afford to fix, and I thought,

"I don't know why I never bought these till now; we've been here 12 long years." I guess it felt like an extravagance at $4.97 each.

Because you hold out so long sometimes. You wait for that first job to take off, and then for the second job to turn into something that will help you heal from the first one.

You wait for your babies to figure out how to walk, holding their fat fingers while gravity yanks at them like a hungry sea. You put your hand over the coffee table corner so they don't hit their heads, and then you watch them drive off with some kids you don't even know to New Orleans for a couple of nights, and you hold your breath and say, "This is alright. I went to Berkeley younger than that." But you're scared too, blaming yourself for everything you are afraid you didn't say or didn't do and wondering if you loved them too much or too little.

You stand in the quiet kitchen and start to pick up the dirty dishes, searching for some kind of confirmation, some kind of GPA, or receipt, or sentence proving that your idealism was foolishness or something sacred, where everything ends up alright after all.

During all that waiting, I've spent $40 bucks on the stupidest things, necessities that didn't poke pretty hands up through black mulch then stretch out their arms like a little four-year-old girl yawning in church, sucking in the air her parents have exhaled while singing, "Surely the presence of the Lord is in this place." But that's something she knows already, because when she opens her fingers into two handfuls of heaven-on-earth, she finds a dozen sweet ants, honey-drunk like an elder board who wasn't expecting the Living God to show up in the middle of an action plan.

And as hard as I've worked, and as much as I've failed, and as much as I've tried to recuperate, and rejuvenate, and jimmy rig, all you do to grow peonies is stick them down in good soil. That's it. And for a hundred or maybe a thousand years, it's done.

Is Jesus Your Boyfriend?

Is it possible to feel something like "romance" for God? For some folks, probably yes. The Bible talks about the church being the bride of Christ, and key figures throughout church history have used marriage language to describe the soul's relationship with the Lord.

Like so many Christian writers have said, language is metaphorical. Nearly every idea we have of God is transposed from what we know of earth, and we never reach a point where we aren't speaking of the 4D in 3D. If the best we know of love on earth is marital intimacy, it makes sense that at least some of us would use that language/context to approach our deepest love.

However, there are three main problems with putting too much emphasis on this one possibility.

First off, there tend to be some fundamental gender differences that impact how people relate to God. For instance, a lot of men would rather approach God as a "Captain" or "Father" instead of as "lover."  It can just get weird for certain dudes to feel the need to think in light of God as "husband." We can argue about that for one reason or another, but in the end, maybe this is why the Bible has so many other metaphors for our relationship with Him?

With the rise of female writers in the church, it's natural that we would hear more about God as "husband." That's how a lot of women tend to relate to our deepest earthly loves, and we have some super gifted female voices expressing that experience right now. That's a good thing, I think. But maybe one symbolic venue isn't sufficient for all people at all times.

Secondly, not all people are fundamentally romantic at the core. Some folks are more analytical by nature. I'm not one of those people (yeah, I'm a big time sensory, poet), but I have friends who are more linear, and putting pressure on those types to "feel" God or want Him in any sort of passionate way can actually damage how they relate to Him. When we insist on romance with God, we can put a yoke on those folks they were never meant to bear.

I've known people who have almost left the church because they were worshipping among people who were so "experience" and "emotional high" focused, they just felt completely out of place. I don't blame them. I understand that some people find God through math, but if I went to a church where Calculus was the prime means of finding God, I would be so discouraged.

Thirdly, I think God is often intentional about letting us live through times when we don't feel Him much at all. C.S. Lewis calls these "troughs," and there are other writers who have spoken about the value of learning to know and obey God when our warmest emotions are simply not a part of the equation.

If we are constantly expecting (needing) a huge gushy rush with the Lord, that's going to cause major trouble when He has a different plan for a different season to grow our hearts. We cannot demand that He provide a certain soul-sensation to sustain us. We have to trust Him when He lets us learn new manifestations of His love.

Just like in a marriage, there are years when a bond itself keeps people together. Contrary to the general beliefs of our feel-good culture, sheer commitment is not a lesser love at all. It's not some sort of "law" that is a reduction of how a relationship "should" work. Will-level commitment is beautiful, because it shows that even when the world grabs hold of us and throws us for a loop, there is an acknowledgement of what "is right" that surpasses what "feels right." 

Telling God that we can't obey Him unless we feel in love with Him is like telling our spouse we can't be faithful to him today if he doesn't romance us well enough. We may have preferences, but we shouldn't give ultimatums. 

Most of the time emotions will swing back in a marriage once the dead time storms pass. Most of the time they will return with God, too, and just like that morning comes after 23 years of marriage when you are late for school because your husband is the best kisser in the entire world (ahem), there might be days when you don't know if your spouse loves you at all. You might not feel it for him, either. You might be furious with him. You might want to quit.

The pendulum has swung back of late to a more affective understanding of spirituality, which was probably a healthy thing, considering the massive focus on systematic theology in the 1990's and the tendencies of the post-modern mind. We had decades of fighters writing about God. Now we have a decade of experience-hungry lovers.

But it's wise for those of us who are poets, musicians, artists - people who are presently in our sweet spot of the cultural groove - to be sensitive to the multi-faceted nature of God. Yes, He is in the sighing Spanish moss and in the wind that tickles the insides of our arms. Yes, He is in the gold and navy clouds that roll like Beethoven over the hills. He is also in logic. He is also in commitment. He is also chasing us in years of drought when we can hardly hear Him at all.

Let's ask more about how He is working in people instead of expecting Him to do the same thing in all of us. Let's learn to trust Him within the boundaries of our innate wiring and whatever spiritual season we are walking through. Let's not assign value to different spiritual languages or metaphors based on what we simply like best. Let's stop insisting that whatever has been our experience (or desired experience) trumps whatever mystery God is working in others. It's loving to do this. It's encouraging to do this. It trusts God to be writing a symphony instead of just a folk song.

image.jpg

Go Viral

There is so much emphasis on "going viral" these days.  Everyday people like you and me constantly read stories about everyday people who manage to find the pulse of our culture, and suddenly they wake up with a fan base in the multi-millions.

 

Even if we don't want fame and glory, there's something about watching this happen that can assign an unspoken value to whatever we spend our time doing. We can start to believe that if we are doing something right, our work is going to get noticed by the digital world.

 

Things are so different now from the culture of my grandmother's generation. She spent hours following magazine directions for sewing, needlework, and home decorating -- just for the sheer pleasure of living somewhere beautiful. Local writers poured their hearts into creating essays for the local paper.  Local musicians practiced for church on Sunday mornings. Mothers spent long afternoons making lovely meals that five people would enjoy before they disappeared forever.

 

These folks never expected a huge audience. They were content to be content with working wonders in a lovely little corner of the world.

 

There's nothing inherently wrong with going viral. In fact, it's great that people with hard questions and heavy hearts can tap into the gifts of common folks and find companionship. But I think it's important to pull the pressure out of that possibility and name it for what it is and isn't. A little clarity can help the rest of us move on into living unburdened, generous lives.

 

Do you remember that story in Mark 14 where a woman with an alabaster jar of expensive perfume comes before Jesus and wastes it by pouring it on his head? Her love for Him made her reckless with the best of what she had. She was so focused on Jesus in that moment that she did something radically beautiful that would disappear overnight.

 

But I love how Jesus receives the gift. He looks beyond the wild extravagance that the woman thought she was offering and makes it even bigger. He places her act of love on the trajectory of eternity.

 

Scroll forward a few days, and we see how after Jesus died he was buried too quickly to have spices applied to his body. The women who loved Him would come to prepare His body in the tomb, but they would find Him already risen. So this woman's alabaster jar full of perfume was the only anointing the Lord received for burial. An act that was sure to be obscure, a wasteful impulse of hidden beauty, became epic.

 

And yes, that creative offering went viral. "Truly, I tell you, wherever the gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her." It's like Jesus is holding up a regular person like you and me to show us that He sees us. It's like He's letting us know that - even if we feel unseen and sometimes foolish for our excesses  - all this beautiful waste of ours is sacred in His eyes when offered with the right heart.

 

Oh, wasteful creators. You who get up and do those silly works of good that go unreported... You who burst your alabaster jars in quiet rooms in quiet towns... You hand-stitchers, you scrawlers of pretty capital letters, you painters of second-hand furniture... You who give an entire afternoon to kneading loaves of homemade bread because your husbands looked weary this morning... You who sit down to color dinosaur pictures with your toddlers... You who sit at the piano for an hour trying to find the next line of a song nobody will ever hear... You who teach immigrants to read before they pass into an unknown future... You who sit down and write letters to Compassion children and add stickers to the bottoms of the pages... You writers of poems only five people read.

 

You are bursting your alabaster jars to pour fragrance on the head of Jesus. You are preparing a passing world for burial, a world that will one day rise again.

 

God who said that whatever we do to the least of our acquaintances we have done to Him, so surely He receives our faith-propelled creativity with the same warmth as he received that woman of Mark 14. Imagine that for a moment.
 
Every time you give of yourself to make the world more beautiful for those in need, you do go viral... not in the world of URLs or Instagram followers... but in that realm where the six-winged Seraphim fly, and where the morning stars sing together, and where all the sons of God shout for joy. If you could see what you were really doing, if the curtains of heaven were pulled back, would you fall to your knees and weep?


Would you see that "you have never met a mere mortal?" Would you see that you have never exercised your imago Dei (the image of God) by hovering over chaos to divide light from darkness without also anointing the head of your King?

image.jpg

This Dangerous Business

When I share Jesus with you, I don't share Him promising you wealth or ease. Instead, I promise that if you take the risk of following Him, you will die deaths you can't even begin to imagine right now.

 

If you follow Him, I doubt that He will entrust you with much money, (though He could). It is far more likely that He will teach you to live without depending upon it. He will show you that you have loved it too much, and He will begin to pry your fingers from it.

 

When I invite you to follow Jesus, I do not invite you to join a dominant cultural movement. I do not promise you refuge inside a comfortable group of educated, upper class, white people. Rather, I invite you to meet a God who will find ways to push you out of your regular social groove into questions you don't even realize  you need to ask and apologies you don't even realize you need to make.

 

He will no longer let you pass by the poor without your heart breaking. He will no longer let you look out at the orphans as statistics. Lost children will become your sons and daughters, and in the faces of the elderly and the widowed, you will find the faces of your own parents.

 

If you follow Jesus, you will begin to feel alienated in many religious settings. You will not fit in right-wing groups that attempt to control men and women by rules and fear. You will not fit in left-wing groups that attempt to use religious freedom as an excuse for selfish living.

 

Your joys will change, too. No longer will you find your biggest thrill in sleeping around, in getting high, in buying things. You will try to chase these old things for a while, and they will still medicate you for a moment or two. But they will no longer thrill you for long. They will begin to cause a cramp in your gut. You will be like a young dog returning to a mother's teet that has dried up. You will try to nurse then be weaned from old distractions.

 

But neither will you find any joy in criticizing others who still find their greatest pleasures in sex, alcohol, drugs, or money. You will see them chasing after the wind and feel sharp sorrow and concern. You will not be able to revel in the mistakes of others... instead you will feel their straining like a deep weight and hunger in your heart.

 

You will wake up and find yourself turning down old pleasures, not out of a desire to appease God, but out of a desire to fill up with with more of Him instead.

 

As your old methods of escape rise up as barriers, you will begin to feel a tremendous nakedness in yourself, as if you are standing in the universe with one great, solitary want. You will see that you have chosen what could never be replaced, should it fall away. You will see that you have burned all of your bridges, and that will catch your breath in your throat, and you will realize that you have been homesick for as long as you can remember.

 

If you follow Jesus, I doubt that He will make you famous or comfortable. You probably won't ever get to build a theme park, or a mega church. You are unlikely to release a record, or write an award-winning book, or speak before millions. It is more likely that He will invite you to wash the dishes, or plant a garden, or wash a poor man's feet.

 

If you follow Jesus, you will also be misunderstood. You will be hated and mocked because of things you do not believe and never have.  You will be grouped together with those who do not know Jesus, but who use His name for their own purposes. You will have nothing in common with those who abuse the name of God, and yet your opponents will not listen when you try to explain the difference.

 

In this tension, you will learn to live among imitators, among charlatans, among liars. Through smoke and mirrors, through jeering, and through all manners of abuse of God's name, you will learn to recognize the voice of the True Shepherd, and you will learn to love it more than any other voice, and you will learn to walk toward it.

 

When I invite you to know my Jesus, I do not invite you into easy answers. I do not invite you into power that you will ever be able to wield at will. I do not invite you into a company of mighty men who will move with you to take over the earth.

 

I invite you into the company of those of who are learning the limits of even our best strengths. I invite you to walk with us through to the ends of science, to the ends of music, to the ends of math, to the ends of art, to the ends of compassion, to the ends of every good and hearty work of all of humankind, to stand bare before the heavens upon the glory of the earth and instead of clenching your fingers, letting them open.

 

I invite you to know Truth which is more than truth. I invite you to know Love which is more than love. I invite you to know a living Person you have always known must be, the One who has allowed you to thirst - and who will allow you to thirst again - so that you can learn to drink from water that will never run dry. 
 
It is not a small invitation. It is the most expensive one you will ever receive, the most difficult, the most confusing, the most clarifying, the most humbling, the most deep, the most honest, and the most beautiful. 
 
I would not offer it to you cheaply, and I would not have you receive it recklessly. Though some try to sweeten the pot, I will warn you instead. This is dangerous business.
Knowing Jesus will cost you all you have. It will likely kill you.
  
But I would be cruel to offer Him to you if I didn't know that some deaths are worth dying. The old life passes away, and the new life comes. We are buried with Him into darkness, and then we are raised with Him into the light. 

image.jpg

When Your Friends Don't Realize What's Wrong With Their Kids

There's a sweet spot in new motherhood where you take your bitty larval human to a playgroup on Wednesday mornings to wobble around on his hands and knees with other larval humans. You coo and cluck with the other young moms for two hours, daydreaming about how your Jack and Meggie's son, Scott, are going to be best friends in first grade, and all is well with the world.

 

What you don't know is that in two years you'll be trying to push strollers around the elementary school sidewalks with Meggie, whose little Scott has now morphed into a full-blown monster. Her kid has already dug his fingernails into your son's bare leg once that morning, and then he laughed when he made it bleed.

 

You tried to forgive that, because this is a toddler, right? But when Scott reaches over, pulls Jack's favorite THINGMYKIDCANTSLEEPWITHOUT out of your stroller and tosses it in the gully, Meggie only smiles and says, "Scottie's arms are so strong lately! He's at 75% on the growth chart now."

 

She never scolds him. She doesn't ask him to get out of the stroller to pick the thing up. She thinks her little hellion is adorable.

 

You take a deep breath, and while pulling the THINGMYKIDCANTSLEEPWITHOUT out of the mud, you try to remember that Scott was a premie, and how scared Meggie was when he almost died those first weeks, and you try, and try, and try to make the excuses she makes for him. But deep down, you know he's just spoiled, and selfish, and you honestly kind of don't like him right now.

 

It's a terrible realization, because we want to like all kids, right? But as an older mom, let me just tell you... most mothers experience this feeling at some point or another. It's hard not to when there are selfish kids in the world whose parents seem to have the ability to completely overlook their flaws.

 

From what I've seen, this tends to be the first big tension between young moms those early years. Then, as toddlers get older, the divide widens. Personalities strengthen. The disparities between what is considered "cute" in one family and "beastly" in another become more evident.  Patience wears off. A sense of justice rises. Playgroups and small groups break up. Adult friendships that were once supportive and nurturing fill with irritation. "Why don't you stop your kid from doing ________ to my kid? What kind of person are you that this doesn't bother you? I thought I knew you!"

 

I remember when this first started happening to me. I was so naive back then, I thought that surely people with similar world views could work little things like this out. What I see now is that there are deep differences in certain women, key influences that took root in us decades ago that have strong impact on how we think children should be trained. And even though some of us might "know" we are "right," when it comes down to the nitty gritty details of what our kids do to each other, we are probably going to disagree on some stuff.

 

So I'm writing this to do two things. First, if you are a young mom experiencing this social weirdness for the first time, don't feel like you have failed by running into it. This just happens to a ton of moms. It's normal.

 

And when it comes time for you to make hard decisions about how you and your kids spend your time with others, it's probably going to feel like there's no easy way out. You haven't necessarily messed up when that hits, either. There might not be an easy way out.

 

It's just awkward when other moms (even moms you love dearly) let their kids do rude, threatening stuff. And even though you can extend love, patience, gentleness, and every generous trait to that mom and her kid, sometimes there's no real solution but making the distance needed to protect your own kids.

 

There are a few rare friends who will let you address this kind of thing and lovingly find a middle ground with you, but from what I've seen, many moms make these decisions down in their gut. Gut decisions are hard to move around. So if you try gently talking about it, and if that doesn't work, it doesn't mean you've done something wrong.  It just means that other family uses rules that don't jive with yours. It's a sad discovery, but it doesn't mean you're a goof up because you couldn't find a pleasant resolution that lets your kids keep playing together all the time. And it doesnt mean there won't come a time later on when the fit works better than it does today.

 

The second reason I'm writing this is to admit the fact that all of our kids probably already have faults that are going to rub somebody else's parenting the absolute wrong way. 

 

My older kids have issues that I can tell need work and change. Those faults might not drive me absolutely batty (well, some of them do), but even if they don't, I can still tell how my children's faults would be mortal sins in another parenting system. I can tell how what I'm trying to work on slowly over time might even cause another parent to need to make some immediate room until the shift takes place.

 

See, most of us moms just have this weird soft spot for our own. It's probably good that we have it, because we'd probably kill them if we didn't. That softness helps us be more patient while training instead of harsh and severe. But that soft spot can so easily become a blind spot over time, and most of us have blind spots, too. None of us do this with perfect wisdom, see?

 

I'm around kids most of the week, and I always have been. Over the past twenty years (as a parent, as a minister to young people, as a teacher) I don't know if I've ever seen a parent who didn't overlook or minimize a severe weakness in his or her kid.

 

That realization calls me to humility. It asks me to a different sort of love for the moms, toddlers, children, and teenagers who kind of drive me crazy sometimes. I'm not saying that love is always easy, but even as I'm making decisions about healthy boundaries between my children and others, I do need to keep my compassion burning.

 

A lot of us tend to feel this weird internal pressure to either not notice the really bad stuff in other people's kids or to kind of be disgusted with them because of it, but grace isn't blind, and that's one of the most beautiful things about it. It's not some wishy washy, spineless disregard of wrongs done. It doesn't let a bratty kid destroy your child's life.

 

Grace looks into a legitimate problem squarely and then sees down the road far enough to claim the beautiful, distant end of what God is doing in a little person; it sees the someday in the present. It frees us up to see the bigger picture of a life in process.

 

Grace for someone else's irritating kid says, "You know, I'm going to try to work this problem through and help our kids stay close. But if in the end, I need to make a little space here for now, I'm not going to let that present need destroy my vision for a whole person. I'm not going to mark anybody's kid off as a hopeless case. I'm going to believe the best of him, and cheer for him, and expect change. And in whatever (maybe limited) way I can be a part of that process now without hurting my own kids, I want to stay engaged. Because just like God is growing me and my kid up, He's chasing that kid, too."

 

The older I get, the more I think that kind of relational health allows for an even tighter bond than forcing ourselves to smile stiffly and pretend we don't see the truth.  It helps us give each other processing time and breathing room. It keeps our expectations and needs in check. It helps us manage the tasks we have been given and trust (without anxiety) while we leave the rest to God's sovereign care.

Photo credit: Morgue File

Photo credit: Morgue File